Adaeze Nwosu v. MAGDALIT BOLDUC, Ms

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
______________________
ADAEZE NWOSU,
Plaintiff-Appellant
v.
MAGDALIT BOLDUC, Ms; Nun, The Catholic Com-
munity of the Beatitudes, LUC VALLIANT, Mr.; Pas-
tor, St Catherine of Siena Catholic Church, THE
ARCHDIOCESE OF DENVER, dba Registered Agent
Archdiocese Of Denver Management Corporation,
THE CATHOLIC COMMUNITY OF THE
BEATITUDES, dba Registered Agent The Catholic
Community Of The Beatitudes, APOLISTIC
NUNCIATURE, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
aka His Eminence Chrisophe Cardinal Pierre, 206
TOURS, INC., and John Doe Defendants,
Defendants-Appellees
______________________
2025-1977
______________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the
District of Colorado in No. 1:24-cv-02578-NYW-TPO, Judge
Nina Y. Wang.
______________________
ON MOTION
______________________
Case: 25-1977 Document: 10 Page: 1 Filed: 10/21/2025

-- 1 of 3 --

NWOSU v. BOLDUC 2
PER CURIAM.
O R D E R
In response to this court’s August 18, 2025 show cause
order, Adaeze Nwosu argues that this court has jurisdic-
tion over her appeal. The appellees have not responded.
Ms. Nwosu appeals from the district court’s July 24,
2025 order in this matter involving discrimination, con-
tract, and negligence claims. The notice of appeal was sent
to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit,
which dismissed for lack of prosecution on August 20, 2025,
after Ms. Nwosu failed to respond to its order to show cause
why the appeal should not be dismissed for lack of an ap-
pealable final decision. In her filings before this court, Ms.
Nwosu appears to seek this court’s review of the district
court decision as well as the Tenth Circuit’s dismissal.
This court’s jurisdiction to review decisions of federal
district courts is generally limited to appeals arising under
the patent laws, see 28 U.S.C. § 1295(a)(1); civil actions on
review to the district court from the United States Patent
and Trademark Office, see id. § 1295(a)(4)(C); or certain
damages claims against the United States “not exceeding
$10,000 in amount,” id. § 1346(a)(2), see id. § 1295(a)(2).
This appeal does not fall within any of those categories, and
this court lacks jurisdiction over a decision of a regional
circuit. Thus, we dismiss the appeal.
Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED THAT:
(1) The appeal is dismissed.
(2) All pending motions are denied.
Case: 25-1977 Document: 10 Page: 2 Filed: 10/21/2025

-- 2 of 3 --

NWOSU v. BOLDUC 3
(3) Each side shall bear its own costs.
October 21, 2025
Date
FOR THE COURT
Case: 25-1977 Document: 10 Page: 3 Filed: 10/21/2025

-- 3 of 3 --