Dashti Sanat Logistics and General Contracting v. Department of the Army

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
______________________
DASHTI SANAT LOGISTICS AND GENERAL
CONTRACTING,
Petitioner
v.
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY,
Respondent
______________________
2025-1899
______________________
Appeal from the ARMY Acquisition Logistics and Tech-
nology in No. RFEADA784GH3.
______________________
Before LOURIE, PROST, and CHEN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
O R D E R
Petitioner, which appears to have a pending matter be-
fore the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals, filed a
petition for review from a letter from the Acting Enterprise
Head of the Contracting Activity for the Department of the
Army. In response to this court’s order to show cause, the
Department of the Army urges dismissal. Petitioner urges
this court to issue a protective order and alternatively re-
quests that this court transfer this matter to the Board.
Case: 25-1899 Document: 10 Page: 1 Filed: 09/26/2025

-- 1 of 2 --

DASHTI SANAT LOGISTICS AND GENERAL CONTRACTING v. ARMY 2
Although this court has jurisdiction to review final de-
cisions of the Board, 28 U.S.C. § 1295(a)(10), the Board has
not reached a final decision from which petitioner can ap-
peal and petitioner has not asked for, let alone demon-
strated entitlement to, interlocutory review. Further,
petitioner has not demonstrated this court has jurisdiction
over a direct appeal from the letter, see 28 U.S.C. § 1295,
and does not identify or seek transfer to another court that
does. Instead, it seeks transfer to the Board, but it fails to
identify any source of authority for this court to transfer a
case to an administrative tribunal or a persuasive basis to
do so even if it were permitted. See 28 U.S.C. § 1631 (per-
mitting transfer to another “court”); Schafer v. Dep’t of In-
terior, 88 F.3d 981, 987 (Fed. Cir. 1996).
Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED THAT:
(1) The matter is dismissed.
(2) Each side shall bear its own costs.
September 26, 2025
Date
FOR THE COURT
Case: 25-1899 Document: 10 Page: 2 Filed: 09/26/2025

-- 2 of 2 --