The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
25-1826•Dee Monbo v. United States
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
______________________
DEE MONBO,
Plaintiff-Appellant
v.
UNITED STATES,
Defendant-Appellee
______________________
2025-1826
______________________
Appeal from the United States Court of Federal Claims
in No. 1:24-cv-01658-CNL, Judge Carolyn N. Lerner.
______________________
Before TARANTO, CUNNINGHAM, and STARK, Circuit
Judges.
PER CURIAM.
O R D E R
The court dismisses this appeal for lack of jurisdiction.
As already explained to Dee Monbo in her earlier appeal in
this same case, “this court only has jurisdiction to review a
‘final decision’ of the Court of Federal Claims, 28 U.S.C.
§ 1295(a)(3), which is one that ‘ends the litigation on the
merits and leaves nothing for the court to do but execute
the judgment,’ Caitlin v. United States, 324 U.S. 229, 233
(1945).” Monbo v. United States, Appeal No. 2025-1495,
Case: 25-1826 Document: 5 Page: 1 Filed: 07/17/2025
-- 1 of 2 --
MONBO v. US 2
ECF No. 35 at 2 (Fed. Cir. May 19, 2025).1 This appeal
from the Court of Federal Claims’s rejection of her response
to the United States’s motion to dismiss clearly does not
end the litigation on the merits.
Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED THAT:
(1) The appeal is dismissed.
(2) Each party shall bear its own costs.
(3) The mandate shall issue forthwith.
July 17, 2025
Date
FOR THE COURT
ISSUED AS A MANDATE: July 17, 2025
1 See Monbo v. United States, Appeal No. 2025-1401,
ECF No. 7 (Fed. Cir. March 26, 2025) (same).
Case: 25-1826 Document: 5 Page: 2 Filed: 07/17/2025
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.