Ricardo Jose Calderon Lopez, dba Starlight Consulting Services, STARLIGHT… v. Ketanji Brown Jackson, Michael Harvey, Ottis D. Wright, Ii, Dale S. Fisher, Alicia…

N OTE: This order is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
______________________
RICARDO JOSE CALDERON LOPEZ, dba Starlight
Consulting Services, STARLIGHT
ENTERTAINMENT ENTERPRISES, INC.,
STARLIGHT MUSIC MANAGEMENT, INC.,
Plaintiffs-Appellants
v.
KETANJI BROWN JACKSON, MICHAEL HARVEY,
OTTIS D. WRIGHT, II, DALE S. FISHER, ALICIA G.
ROSENBERG, STEPHEN WILSON, KANDIS A.
WESTMORE, EDWARD J. DAVILA, LUCY H. KOH,
EDWARD M. CHEN, MAXINE M. CHESNEY,
DONALD L. GRAHAM, in their individual capaci-
ties,
Defendants-Appellees
______________________
2024-2046
______________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the
Central District of California in No. 2:22-cv-01562-PA-
RAO, Judge Percy Anderson.
______________________
ON MOTION
______________________
Case: 24-2046 Document: 5 Page: 1 Filed: 07/25/2024

-- 1 of 3 --

CALDERON LOPEZ v. JACKSON 2
P ER CURIAM .
O R D E R
Ricardo Jose Calderon Lopez moves for leave to proceed
in forma pauperis. The court dismisses this appeal for lack
of jurisdiction.
On March 10, 2022, the district court dismissed
Mr. Calderon Lopez’s complaint directed at various federal
judges. Mr. Calderon Lopez appealed that decision to the
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit,
which dismissed for failure to prosecute on June 21, 2022.
On June 14, 2024, Mr. Calderon Lopez filed a notice of ap-
peal from the “3/10/22” decision. ECF No. 1-2 at 1.
“[T]he timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case
is a jurisdictional requirement,” Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S.
205, 214 (2007), and, in order to be timely, a notice of ap-
peal must generally be filed within 60 days after entry of
final judgment when a case involves United States officers,
28 U.S.C. § 2107; Fed. R. App. P. 4. Here, Mr. Calderon
Lopez’s notice of appeal, filed more than 2 years after the
district court entered final judgment, is clearly untimely.
For at least this reason, we and any other court of appeals
lack jurisdiction.
Accordingly,
Case: 24-2046 Document: 5 Page: 2 Filed: 07/25/2024

-- 2 of 3 --

CALDERON LOPEZ v. JACKSON 3
I T I S O RDERED T HAT :
(1) The appeal is dismissed, and all pending motions
are denied.
(2) Each party shall bear its own costs.
July 25, 2024
Date
F OR THE COURT
Case: 24-2046 Document: 5 Page: 3 Filed: 07/25/2024

-- 3 of 3 --