Rapidpulse, Inc. v. Penumbra, Inc.

24-1130Court of Appeals for the Federal CircuitOct 14, 2025

Full text

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
______________________
RAPIDPULSE, INC.,
Appellant
v.
PENUMBRA, INC.,
Appellee
______________________
2024-1130, 2024-1131
______________________
Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark
Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2021-
01466, IPR2022-00608.
______________________
JUDGMENT
______________________
G ABRIEL K. BELL, Latham & Watkins LLP, Washing-
ton, DC, argued for appellant. Also represented by ASHLEY
M. FRY , QIUSHI (WILLIAM) YAO; CHARLES SANDERS, Boston,
MA.
ELIOT D AMON W ILLIAMS, Baker Botts LLP, Washing-
ton, DC, argued for appellee. Also represented by M ARK
O DA , JEREMY TAYLOR , San Francisco, CA.
______________________
Case: 24-1130 Document: 45 Page: 1 Filed: 10/14/2025

-- 1 of 2 --

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
O RDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (DYK, HUGHES, and S TARK, Circuit
Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY O RDER OF THE COURT
October 14, 2025
Date
Case: 24-1130 Document: 45 Page: 2 Filed: 10/14/2025

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.