The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
23-2285•Maxell, Ltd. v. Amperex Technology Limited
23-2285Court of Appeals for the Federal CircuitJan 15, 2025
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
______________________
MAXELL, LTD.,
Appellant
v.
AMPEREX TECHNOLOGY LIMITED,
Appellee
______________________
2023-2285
______________________
Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark
Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2021-
01442.
______________________
JUDGMENT
______________________
JEFFREY TA-HWA HAN, Vinson & Elkins LLP, Austin,
TX, argued for appellant. Also represented by CORBIN
CESSNA, HILARY L. PRESTON, ERIK SHALLMAN; ERIC JOSEPH
KLEIN, PAIGE HOLLAND WRIGHT, Dallas, TX.
KIRK T. BRADLEY, Alston & Bird LLP, Charlotte, NC,
argued for appellee. Also represented by CHRISTOPHER
TIMOTHY LAWN DOUGLAS, NICHOLAS CHRISTOPHER MARAIS;
BRADY COX, Dallas, TX.
______________________
Case: 23-2285 Document: 40 Page: 1 Filed: 01/15/2025
-- 1 of 2 --
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (PROST, TARANTO, and CHEN, Circuit
Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
January 15, 2025
Date
Case: 23-2285 Document: 40 Page: 2 Filed: 01/15/2025
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.