The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
23-1935•Lynk Labs, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
23-1935Court of Appeals for the Federal CircuitOct 16, 2024
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
______________________
LYNK LABS, INC.,
Appellant
v.
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.,
Appellee
______________________
2023-1935
______________________
Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark
Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2021-
01347.
______________________
JUDGMENT
______________________
STEPHEN MCBRIDE, Carmichael Ip, Tysons, VA, argued
for appellant. Also represented by JAMES CARMICHAEL,
STEPHEN TERRY SCHREINER, MINGHUI YANG.
IGOR VICTOR TIMOFEYEV, Paul Hastings LLP,
Washington, DC, argued for appellee. Also represented by
NAVEEN MODI, JOSEPH PALYS.
______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
Case: 23-1935 Document: 45 Page: 1 Filed: 10/16/2024
-- 1 of 2 --
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (LOURIE, PROST, and STARK, Circuit
Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
October 16, 2024
Date
Case: 23-1935 Document: 45 Page: 2 Filed: 10/16/2024
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.