The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
23-1934•Lynk Labs, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
23-1934Court of Appeals for the Federal CircuitOct 16, 2024
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
______________________
LYNK LABS, INC.,
Appellant
v.
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.,
Appellee
______________________
2023-1934
______________________
Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark
Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2021-
01300.
______________________
JUDGMENT
______________________
STEPHEN TERRY SCHREINER, Carmichael Ip, Tysons,
VA, argued for appellant. Also represented by JAMES
CARMICHAEL, STEPHEN MCBRIDE, MINGHUI YANG.
DANIEL ZEILBERGER, Paul Hastings LLP, Washington,
DC, argued for appellee. Also represented by NAVEEN
MODI, JOSEPH PALYS, IGOR VICTOR TIMOFEYEV, DAVID
VALENTE.
______________________
Case: 23-1934 Document: 52 Page: 1 Filed: 10/16/2024
-- 1 of 2 --
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (LOURIE, PROST, and STARK, Circuit
Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
October 16, 2024
Date
Case: 23-1934 Document: 52 Page: 2 Filed: 10/16/2024
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.