The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
23-1126•B.e. Technology, L.l.c. v. TWITTER, INC., GOOGLE LLC, Cross-Appellants 2023-1126, 2023-1127, 2023-1128,…
23-1126Court of Appeals for the Federal CircuitAug 13, 2024
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
______________________
B.E. TECHNOLOGY, L.L.C.,
Appellant
v.
TWITTER, INC., GOOGLE LLC,
Cross-Appellants
______________________
2023-1126, 2023-1127, 2023-1128, 2023-1130, 2023-1131,
2023-1132
______________________
Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark
Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2021-
00482, IPR2021-00483, IPR2021-00484, IPR2021-00485.
______________________
JUDGMENT
______________________
K AYVAN B. N OROOZI, Noroozi PC, Los Angeles, CA, ar-
gued for appellant. Also represented by CHARLES
WIZENFELD, King & Wood Mallesons LLP, New York, NY.
N ATHAN K. K ELLEY , Perkins Coie LLP, Washington,
DC, argued for all cross-appellants. Cross-appellant
Google LLC also represented by D AN L. BAGATELL , Hano-
ver, NH; ANDREW D UFRESNE, Madison, WI; ANDREW
BALUCH , Smith Baluch LLP, Washington, DC.
Case: 23-1126 Document: 51 Page: 1 Filed: 08/13/2024
-- 1 of 2 --
D AVID L. MC COMBS , Haynes and Boone, LLP, Dallas,
TX, for cross-appellant Twitter, Inc. Also represented by
D EBRA J ANECE MCC OMAS ; ANGELA M. O LIVER, Washington,
DC.
______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
O RDERED and ADJUDGED:
P ER CURIAM (L OURIE, P ROST , and REYNA, Circuit
Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY O RDER OF THE COURT
August 13, 2024
Date
Case: 23-1126 Document: 51 Page: 2 Filed: 08/13/2024
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.