The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
23-1108•George H. Finn v. State of New York, Hinman Howard & Kattell, LLC, Katherine A. Fitzgerald, Harvey…
23-1108Court of Appeals for the Federal CircuitJan 30, 2023
N OTE: This order is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
______________________
GEORGE H. FINN,
Plaintiff-Appellant
v.
STATE OF NEW YORK, HINMAN HOWARD &
KATTELL, LLC, KATHERINE A. FITZGERALD,
HARVEY SHAPIRO, NELSON F. MIGDAL, RONALD
SCHIESS, BRUCE W. SNYDER, DELTA
ENGINEERS, ARCHITECTS, & LAND SURVEYORS,
PC, JENEE RASMUSSEN-GREEN, RONALD
GREEN, RASMUSSEN LAND SURVEY PLLC,
Defendants-Appellees
______________________
2023-1108
______________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the
Northern District of New York in No. 3:22-cv-00721-DNH-
ML, Judge David N. Hurd.
______________________
P ER CURIAM .
O R D E R
In response to this court’s November 21, 2022, show
cause order, George H. Finn argues in favor of this court’s
jurisdiction. Appellees have not responded.
Case: 23-1108 Document: 6 Page: 1 Filed: 01/30/2023
-- 1 of 2 --
FINN v. STATE OF NEW YORK 2
This case involves a land dispute in which Mr. Finn has
alleged various civil rights and criminal violations. After
the United States District Court for the Northern District
of New York dismissed his complaint, Mr. Finn filed a no-
tice of appeal seeking review in this court.
Mr. Finn’s appeal does not come within the limited au-
thority that Congress granted this court to review decisions
of federal district courts under 28 U.S.C. § 1295(a). That
jurisdiction extends only over cases arising under the pa-
tent laws, see 28 U.S.C. § 1295(a)(1); civil actions on review
to the district court from the United States Patent and
Trademark Office, see § 1295(a)(4)(C); or certain damages
claims against the United States “not exceeding $10,000 in
amount,” 28 U.S.C. § 1346(a)(2), see 28 U.S.C.§ 1295(a)(2).
Mr. Finn’s case does not fall into any of these categories, as
his complaint does not assert claims against the United
States (the defendants are the State of New York and sev-
eral private individuals and entities).
This court, under 28 U.S.C. § 1631, shall, if in the in-
terest of justice, transfer an appeal to another court where
it could have been brought at the time it was filed. Here,
that court is the United States Court of Appeals for the Sec-
ond Circuit.
Accordingly,
I T I S O RDERED T HAT :
The appeal and all its filings are transferred to the
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit pur-
suant to 28 U.S.C. § 1631.
January 30, 2023
Date
F OR THE COURT
/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner
Peter R. Marksteiner
Clerk of Court
Case: 23-1108 Document: 6 Page: 2 Filed: 01/30/2023
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.