The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
23-107•Federal Circuit disposition — 23-107
23-107Court of Appeals for the Federal CircuitDec 2, 2022
N OTE: This order is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
______________________
In re: SWIRLATE IP LLC,
Petitioner
______________________
2023-107
______________________
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus to the United
States District Court for the District of Delaware in Nos.
1:22-cv-00235-CFC and 1:22-cv-00249-CFC, Chief Judge
Colm F. Connolly.
______________________
ON PETITION
______________________
P ER CURIAM .
O R D E R
Swirlate IP LLC submits a petition for a writ of
mandamus directing the United States District Court for
the District of Delaware to vacate its September 12, 2022,
order setting an evidentiary hearing for December 6,
2022, which three named individuals are directed to
attend, and to otherwise end proceedings relating to the
district court’s standing orders of April 18, 2022.
This court concludes that Swirlate has not shown that
the standards for mandamus relief are currently met.
This court notes three considerations, without suggesting
Case: 23-107 Document: 4 Page: 1 Filed: 12/02/2022
-- 1 of 2 --
IN RE: SWIRLATE IP LLC 2
they are the only pertinent ones. First, the district court
has, on December 1, 2022, itself stayed the September
order. Second, the September order does not order disclo-
sure of information for which privilege protections are
claimed. Third, although Swirlate contends that this case
has been dismissed, it has not substantiated the conten-
tion. The parties filed a stipulation to dismiss the claims
with prejudice, and the counterclaims without prejudice,
“subject to the approval and order of the” district court,
under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2) and (c). Appx. 134 (D. Ct.
Dkt. # 28). But neither approval by the district court nor
entry of a dismissal order has been shown.
Accordingly,
I T I S O RDERED T HAT :
The petition for a writ of mandamus is denied.
December 2, 2022
Date
F OR THE COURT
/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner
Peter R. Marksteiner
Clerk of Court
Case: 23-107 Document: 4 Page: 2 Filed: 12/02/2022
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.