The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
22-1926•Sito Mobile R&dip, LLC, Sito Mobile, Ltd. v. Hulu, LLC
22-1926Court of Appeals for the Federal CircuitApr 5, 2024
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
______________________
SITO MOBILE R&D IP, LLC, SITO MOBILE, LTD.,
Appellants
v.
HULU, LLC,
Appellee
______________________
2022-1926, 2022-1927, 2022-1977, 2022-1989, 2022-2262
______________________
Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark
Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2021-
00158, IPR2021-00206, IPR2021-00219, IPR2021-00265,
IPR2021-00308.
______________________
JUDGMENT
______________________
STEPHEN T ERRY SCHREINER , Carmichael Ip, Tysons,
VA, argued for appellants. Also represented by J AMES
CARMICHAEL , MINGHUI YANG; J ASON SCOTT CHARKOW ,
RONALD M. D AIGNAULT , CHANDRAN I YER, RICHARD J UANG,
K EVIN SPRENGER, Daignault Iyer LLP, Vienna, VA.
AMY L IANG, O’Melveny & Myers LLP, San Francisco,
CA, argued for appellee. Also represented by BRADLEY M.
BERG, CAMERON WILLIAM WESTIN, BRETT J OHNSTON
Case: 22-1926 Document: 83 Page: 1 Filed: 04/05/2024
-- 1 of 2 --
WILLIAMSON, Newport Beach, CA N ATHANIEL L EGUM , Los
Angeles, CA.
______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
O RDERED and ADJUDGED:
P ER CURIAM (D YK, BRYSON, and STOLL , Circuit
Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY O RDER OF THE COURT
April 5, 2024
Date
Case: 22-1926 Document: 83 Page: 2 Filed: 04/05/2024
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.