Kaotica Ip Corp. v. Iconic Mars Corporation, Oluseyi James Olaleye

N OTE: This order is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
______________________
KAOTICA IP CORP.,
Plaintiff-Appellant
v.
ICONIC MARS CORPORATION, OLUSEYI JAMES
OLALEYE,
Defendants-Appellees
______________________
2022-1816
______________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the
Southern District of California in No. 3:21-cv-00433-CAB-
DEB, Judge Cathy Ann Bencivengo.
______________________
ON MOTION
______________________
Before D YK, REYNA, and T ARANTO, Circuit Judges.
REYNA, Circuit Judge.
O R D E R
Before the filing of its opening brief, the appellant
Kaotica IP Corp. moves to voluntarily dismiss its appeal.
The appellees respond that they “have incurred costs and
attorney’s fees on this appeal, and [they] wish to abide by
Case: 22-1816 Document: 18 Page: 1 Filed: 10/21/2022

-- 1 of 2 --

KAOTICA IP CORP. v. ICONIC MARS CORPORATION 2
this Court’s determination concerning whether costs
and/or attorney’s fees are recoverable in these circum-
stances.” Resp. at 1.
Upon consideration thereof,
I T I S O RDERED T HAT :
The court has sua sponte determined that the award
of attorneys’ fees and costs is not appropriate. Kaotica’s
motion is granted to the extent the appeal is dismissed
with each party to bear its own costs.
October 21, 2022
Date
F OR THE COURT
/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner
Peter R. Marksteiner
Clerk of Court
ISSUED AS A MANDATE: October 21, 2022
Case: 22-1816 Document: 18 Page: 2 Filed: 10/21/2022

-- 2 of 2 --