The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
22-1465•Arbor Global Strategies, LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, Ltd.
22-1465Court of Appeals for the Federal CircuitJul 16, 2024
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
______________________
ARBOR GLOBAL STRATEGIES, LLC,
Appellant
v.
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., TAIWAN
SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING COMPANY,
LTD.,
Appellees
KATHERINE K. VIDAL, UNDER SECRETARY OF
COMMERCE FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
AND DIRECTOR OF THE UNITED STATES
PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE,
Intervenor
______________________
2022-1465, 2022-1466, 2022-1467
______________________
Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark
Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2020-
01020, IPR2020-01021, IPR2020-01022.
-------------------------------------------------
ARBOR GLOBAL STRATEGIES, LLC,
Appellant
Case: 22-1465 Document: 117 Page: 1 Filed: 07/16/2024
-- 1 of 3 --
v.
XILINX, INC., TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR
MANUFACTURING CO. LTD.,
Appellees
KATHERINE K. VIDAL, UNDER SECRETARY OF
COMMERCE FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
AND DIRECTOR OF THE UNITED STATES
PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE,
Intervenor
______________________
2022-1549, 2022-1550, 2022-1551, 2022-1552
______________________
Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark
Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2020-
01567, IPR2020-01568, IPR2020-01570, IPR2020-01571.
______________________
JUDGMENT
______________________
D ANIEL N OAH L ERMAN, Kramer Levin Naftalis &
Frankel LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellant. Also
represented by P AUL J. ANDRE, J AMES R. HANNAH , L ISA
K OBIALKA, Redwood Shores, CA, J EFFREY P RICE , New
York, NY.
J OHN C. O'Q UINN, Kirkland & Ellis LLP, Washington,
DC, argued for appellees Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.,
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, Ltd.
Samsung Electronic Co., Ltd. also represented by WILLIAM
H. BURGESS , CHRISTOPHER MIZZO; M EREDITH ZINANNI, Chi-
cago, IL.
J AMES M. G LASS , Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan,
Case: 22-1465 Document: 117 Page: 2 Filed: 07/16/2024
-- 2 of 3 --
LLP, New York, NY, for appellee Taiwan Semiconductor
Manufacturing Company, Ltd. Also represented by ERIC
HUANG.
J EFFREY SHNEIDMAN, Fish & Richardson P.C., Boston,
MA, argued for appellee Xilinx, Inc. Also represented by
K ENNETH WAYNE D ARBY , D AVID M. HOFFMAN, Austin, TX;
J OHN A. D RAGSETH , Minneapolis, MN.
D ANA K AERSVANG , Civil Division, United States De-
partment of Justice, Washington, DC, argued for interve-
nor. Also represented by BRIAN M. BOYNTON , J OSHUA MARC
SALZMAN; MICHAEL S. F ORMAN, F ARHEENA Y ASMEEN
RASHEED, MICHAEL T YLER, Office of the Solicitor, United
States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA.
______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
O RDERED and ADJUDGED:
P ER CURIAM (HUGHES , L INN, and STARK, Circuit
Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY O RDER OF THE COURT
July 16, 2024
Date
Case: 22-1465 Document: 117 Page: 3 Filed: 07/16/2024
-- 3 of 3 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.