The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
22-1437•M2m Solutions LLC v. Sierra Wireless America, Inc., Sierra Wireless, Inc.
22-1437Court of Appeals for the Federal CircuitApr 19, 2022
N OTE: This order is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
______________________
M2M SOLUTIONS LLC,
Plaintiff
BLACKBIRD TECH LLC, dba Blackbird Technolo-
gies,
Plaintiff-Appellant
v.
SIERRA WIRELESS AMERICA, INC., SIERRA
WIRELESS, INC.,
Defendants-Appellees
______________________
2022-1437
______________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the
District of Delaware in No. 1:14-cv-01102-RGA, Judge
Richard G. Andrews.
______________________
ON MOTION
______________________
Before P ROST , REYNA, and CUNNINGHAM , Circuit Judges.
CUNNINGHAM , Circuit Judge.
Case: 22-1437 Document: 9 Page: 1 Filed: 04/19/2022
-- 1 of 3 --
M 2M SOLUTIONS LLC v. SIERRA WIRELESS AMERICA, INC. 2
O R D E R
Appellant Blackbird Tech LLC, d/b/a Blackbird Tech-
nologies (“Blackbird”) states that “the filing of this appeal
may have been premature” and thus moves unopposed to
voluntarily dismiss its appeal under Federal Rule of Appel-
late Procedure 42(b). Blackbird further requests that if its
appeal is premature, no additional filing fees be required
for filing a subsequent appeal.
Blackbird appeals from the district court’s January 3,
2022, decision granting Sierra Wireless America, Inc. and
Sierra Wireless Inc.’s motion for attorney fees pursuant to
35 U.S.C. § 285. Neither that decision nor any subsequent
filing has yet quantified the amount of the attorney fees,
however, and “[w]e lack jurisdiction over the unquantified
attorney’s fees decision.” Elbit Sys. Land & C4I Ltd. v.
Hughes Network Sys., LLC, 927 F.3d 1292, 1294 (Fed. Cir.
2019). This appeal thus is premature, though we will allow
it to be reinstated under the same docket number, without
the payment of an additional filing fee, if, within 60 days of
this order, Blackbird appeals from the entry of a final at-
torney fees award.
Accordingly,
I T I S O RDERED T HAT :
(1) The motion is granted to the extent that the appeal
is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction, subject, however, to re-
instatement under the same docket number, without pay-
ment of any additional filing fee, if, within 60 days of this
order, Blackbird appeals from the entry of a final attorney
fees award. The mandate shall issue simultaneously with
this order.
Case: 22-1437 Document: 9 Page: 2 Filed: 04/19/2022
-- 2 of 3 --
M 2M SOLUTIONS LLC v. SIERRA WIRELESS AMERICA, INC. 3
(2) Each side shall bear its own costs.
April 19, 2022
Date
F OR THE COURT
/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner
Peter R. Marksteiner
Clerk of Court
ISSUED AS A MANDATE: April 19, 2022
Case: 22-1437 Document: 9 Page: 3 Filed: 04/19/2022
-- 3 of 3 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.