The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
22-134•Sonos, Inc. v. Google LLC
N OTE: This order is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
______________________
SONOS, INC.,
Plaintiff-Petitioner
v.
GOOGLE LLC,
Defendant-Cross-Petitioner
______________________
2022-134, 2022-144
______________________
On Petitions for Permission to Appeal pursuant to 28
U.S.C. Section 1292(b) from the United States District
Court for the Northern District of California in No. 3:21-cv-
07559-WHA, Judge William H. Alsup.
______________________
ON PETITION
______________________
Before D YK, REYNA, and CHEN, Circuit Judges.
P ER CURIAM .
O R D E R
The parties each petition for permission to appeal from
an order of the United States District Court for the North-
ern District of California concerning the sufficiency of the
pleadings under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 8(a) and
Case: 22-134 Document: 13 Page: 1 Filed: 05/11/2022
-- 1 of 2 --
SONOS, INC. v. GOOGLE LLC 2
12(b)(6). The district court certified the order for appeal
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b).
Under the express language of § 1292(b), this court has
“discretion” whether to “permit an appeal to be taken” un-
der the provision. See Digit. Equip. Corp. v. Desktop Direct,
Inc., 511 U.S. 863, 883 n.9 (1994) (noting “broad” discre-
tion). Having considered the matter, we decline to permit
interlocutory review in this case.
Accordingly,
I T I S O RDERED T HAT :
The petition and cross-petition for permission to appeal
are denied.
May 11, 2022
Date
F OR THE COURT
/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner
Peter R. Marksteiner
Clerk of Court
Case: 22-134 Document: 13 Page: 2 Filed: 05/11/2022
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.