The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
22-1284•Srk Technology LLC v. Snap Inc.
22-1284Court of Appeals for the Federal CircuitMay 4, 2023
N OTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
______________________
SRK TECHNOLOGY LLC,
Appellant
v.
SNAP INC.,
Appellee
______________________
2022-1284, 2022-1285
______________________
Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark
Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2020-
00819, IPR2020-00820.
______________________
JUDGMENT
______________________
VINCENT J. RUBINO, III, Fabricant LLP, Rye, NY, ar-
gued for appellant. Also represented by ALFRED ROSS
F ABRICANT , E NRIQUE WILLIAM I TURRALDE, P ETER
L AMBRIANAKOS .
HEIDI L YN K EEFE , Cooley LLP, Palo Alto, CA, argued
for appellee. Also represented by REUBEN H. CHEN,
BENJAMIN S. L IN, ANDREW CARTER M ACE, MARK R.
WEINSTEIN.
______________________
Case: 22-1284 Document: 38 Page: 1 Filed: 05/04/2023
-- 1 of 2 --
T HIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
O RDERED and ADJUDGED:
P ER CURIAM (P ROST , REYNA, and STARK, Circuit
Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY O RDER OF THE COURT
May 4, 2023
Date
/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner
Peter R. Marksteiner
Clerk of Court
Case: 22-1284 Document: 38 Page: 2 Filed: 05/04/2023
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.