The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
22-1226•Royal Brush Manufacturing, Inc. v. United States, Dixon Ticonderoga Company
22-1226Court of Appeals for the Federal CircuitAug 4, 2023
N OTE: This order is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
______________________
August 4, 2023
ERRATA
______________________
Appeal No. 2022-1226
ROYAL BRUSH MANUFACTURING, INC.,
Plaintiff-Appellant
v.
UNITED STATES, DIXON TICONDEROGA
COMPANY,
Defendants-Appellees
______________________
Decided: July 27, 2023
Precedential Opinion
______________________
Please make the following change:
In the first sentence of the last paragraph on page 15, de-
lete the word “not.” The corrected sentence should read:
“The government nonetheless argues that confidential
business information cannot be disclosed absent a statute
or regulation authorizing a protective order.”
Case: 22-1226 Document: 79 Page: 1 Filed: 08/04/2023
-- 1 of 1 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.