The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
2013-3007•Geraldine J. Nikrasch v. United States Postal Service
2013-3007Court of Appeals for the Federal CircuitMar 4, 2013
N OTE: This order is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
__________________________
GERALDINE J. NIKRASCH,
Petitioner,
v.
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE,
Respondent.
__________________________
2013-3007
__________________________
Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection
Board in case no. CH0353120242-I-1.
__________________________
Before N EWMAN, L OURIE and REYNA, Circuit Judges.
P ER CURIAM .
O R D E R
The court considers whether Geraldine J.
Nikrasch’s petition for review should be dismissed.
This petition stems from an initial decision of the
Merit Systems Protection Board (“Board”). Subsequently,
Nikrasch filed a petition for review of that decision with
both the Board and this court. Because Nikrasch may not
Case: 13-3007 Document: 6 Page: 1 Filed: 03/04/2013
-- 1 of 2 --
GERALDINE NIKRASCH v. USPS 2
simultaneously proceed in both fora, we directed her by
order of October 11, 2012, to inform this court within 21
days that she had dismissed her petition at the Board or
her petition would be dismissed. Because Nikrasch has
not done so, we dismiss. Nikrasch may appeal after the
full Board disposes of her pending petition.
Accordingly,
I T I S O RDERED T HAT :
(1) The petition for review is dismissed.
(2) Each side shall bear its own costs.
F OR T HE COURT
/s/ Jan Horbaly
Jan Horbaly
Clerk
s25
Case: 13-3007 Document: 6 Page: 2 Filed: 03/04/2013
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.