The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
2012-7131•Ernestine H. Broxsie v. Eric K. Shinseki, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
2012-7131Court of Appeals for the Federal CircuitAug 13, 2012
# NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
ERNESTINE H. BROXSIE,
Claimant-Appellant,
V.
ERIC K. SHINSEKI, SECRETARY OF VETERANS
AFFAIRS,
Respondent-Appellee.
2012-7131
Appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for
Veterans Claims in case no. 10-4324, Judge Ronald M.
Holdaway.
ON MOTION
Before PROST, MAYER and REYNA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
## ORDER
Ernestine H. Broxsie responds to the court's June 21,
2012 order requiring her to show cause why this appeal
should not be dismissed as untimely. The Secretary also
<!-- PageBreak -->
<!-- PageHeader="ERNESTINE BROXSIE v. SHINSEKI" -->
responds, requesting that the appeal be dismissed for lack
of jurisdiction.
The Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims entered
judgment in this case on March 16, 2012. The court
received Broxsie's notice of appeal on May 22, 2012, 67
days after the date of the judgment.
Any appeal from the Court of Appeals for Veterans
Claims must be received within 60 days of the date of
entry of judgment. 38 U.S.C. § 7292(a); 28 U.S.C.
§ 2107(b); Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1). The statutory deadline
for taking an appeal to this court is jurisdictional and
mandatory. See Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205 (2007);
see also Henderson v. Shinseki, 131 S. Ct. 1197, 1204-05
(2011) (noting Congress's intent to impose the same
jurisdictional restrictions on an appeal from the Veterans
Court to the Federal Circuit as on an appeal from a
district court to a court of appeals).
\-
Broxsie notes that she moved while her appeal was
pending below and she did not receive a copy of the Vet-
erans Court's decision at her new address. However, the
duty to monitor the status of the case falls on the appel-
lant. See, e.g., Witty v. Dukakis, 3 F.3d 517, 521 (1st Cir.
1993). In any event, this court "has no authority to create
equitable exceptions to jurisdictional requirements," even
if such "rigorous rules . .. are thought to be inequitable[.]"
Bowles, 551 U.S. at 214. Because this appeal was not
received within the statutory period, we must dismiss.
Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED THAT:
(1) The motion is granted. The appeal is dismissed.
(2) Each side shall bear its own costs.
<!-- PageBreak -->
ERNESTINE BROXSIE V. SHINSEKI
FOR THE COURT
AUG 13 2012
Date
/s/ Jan Horbaly
Jan Horbaly
Clerk
cc: Ernestine H. Broxsie
Joseph A. Pixley, Esq.
$25
FILED
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR
THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT
AUG 13 2012
JAN HORBALY
CLERK
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.