The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
2012-1530•Spectros Corp. v. Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc. (doing Business As Nano Drop)
2012-1530Court of Appeals for the Federal CircuitSep 13, 2012
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.
# United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
SPECTROS CORP.,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
V.
THERMO FISHER SCIENTIFIC, INC. (DOING
BUSINESS AS NANO DROP),
Defendant-Appellee.
2012-1530
Appeal from the United States District Court for the
Northern District of California in case no. 09-CV-1996,
Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong.
## ON MOTION
ORDER
Upon consideration of Spectros Corp.'s unopposed mo-
tion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal from case no. 09-
CV-1996 (N.D. Cal.),
IT IS ORDERED THAT:
(1) The motion is granted.
<!-- PageBreak -->
<!-- PageHeader="SPECTROS CORP. v. THERMO FISHER SCIENTIFIC, INC." -->
(2) Each side shall bear its own costs.
FOR THE COURT
SEP 1 3 2012
Date
/s/ Jan Horbaly
Jan Horbaly
Clerk
cc: Edward W. Goldstein, Esq.
Kenneth E. Keller, Esq.
s26
Issued As A Mandate:
SEP 1 3 2012
FILED
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR
THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT
SEP 13 2012
JAN HORBALY
CLERK
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.