Irwin Industrial Tool Company v. Bibow Industries

2012-1079Court of Appeals for the Federal CircuitJan 9, 2012

Full text

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.
Wniteb $tate~ <!Court of ~eal~
for tbe jfeberal <!Circuit
IRWIN INDUSTRIAL TOOL COMPANY
(DOING BUSINESS AS LENOX),
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v_
BIBOW INDUSTRIES, INC. AND CHRISTOPHER W.
BIBOW,
Defendants-Appellants.
2012-1079
Appeal from the United States District Court for the
District of Massachusetts in case no. ll-CV-30023, Judge
Douglas P . Woodlock.
ON MOTION
ORDER
Bibow Industries, Inc. and Christopher W. Bibow
move to withdraw their appeal.
Upon consideration thereof,
IT Is ORDERED THAT:

-- 1 of 2 --

IRWIN INDUSTRIAL v. BIBOW INDUSTRIES 2
(1) The motion to withdraw the appeal is granted.
The appeal is dismissed.
(2) Each side shall bear its own costs.
JAN 092012
Date
cc: John A. Burlingame, Esq.
Edward P. Dutkiewicz, Esq.
s21
FOR THE COURT
/s/ Jan Horbaly
Jan Horbaly
Clerk
Issued As A Mandate: -----'J:.:.;Ac:..:. N--'O:.....:9'--2=-:O_12___
FILED
u.s. COllRT OF APPEALS FOR
THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT
JAN 092012
JAN HOR8A1.V
CLERK

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.