Alcohol Monitoring Systems, Inc. v. Actsoft, Inc., Ohio House Monitoring Systems, Inc.

N OTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
______________________
ALCOHOL MONITORING SYSTEMS, INC.,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
ACTSOFT, INC.,
OHIO HOUSE MONITORING SYSTEMS, INC.
AND US HOME DETENTION SYSTEMS AND
EQUIPMENT, INC.,
Defendants-Appellees.
____________________
2012-1066
______________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the
District of Colorado in consolidated Nos. 07-CV-2261 and
08-CV-1226, Judge Philip A. Brimmer.
______________________
JUDGMENT
______________________
MICHAEL G. MARTIN, Lathrop & Gage LLP, of
Denver, Colorado, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With
him on the brief were P HILIP S. L ORENZO and J AMES E.
D ALLNER.

-- 1 of 2 --

K YLE B. F LEMING, Renner, Otto, Boisselle & Sklar,
LLP, of Cleveland, Ohio, argued for defendant-appellee.
With him on the brief were T ODD R. T UCKER and
N ICHOLAS J. G INGO, for Actsoft, Inc., et al. Of counsel on
the brief were Richard E. Fee and Kathleen M. Wade, Fee
& Jeffries P.A., of Tampa, Florida, for Actsoft, Inc.
______________________
T HIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
O RDERED and A DJUDGED:
P ER CURIAM (P ROST , MOORE, and R EYNA, Circuit
Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY O RDER OF THE COURT
March 1, 2013 /s/ Jan Horbaly
Date Jan Horbaly
Clerk

-- 2 of 2 --