Dominic Sabbia v. ERIC K. SHINSEKI, Secretary of Veterans Affairs

2010-7026Court of Appeals for the Federal CircuitMar 23, 2010

Full text

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

# United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2010-7026

DOMINIC SABBIA,

Claimant-Appellant,

V.

ERIC K. SHINSEKI, Secretary of Veterans Affairs,
Respondent-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims
in case no. 08-3638, Judge Alan G. Lance, Sr.

ON MOTION

Before MICHEL, Chief Judge, FRIEDMAN and LINN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.

## ORDER

The Secretary of Veterans Affairs moves for summary affirmance of the United
States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims' judgment in Sabbia v. Shinseki, 08-3638,
that dismissed Dominic Sabbia's appeal to that court for lack of jurisdiction. We
consider whether we have jurisdiction over Sabbia's appeal to this court.

Sabbia filed a notice of appeal with the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims,
asserting that he was seeking review of a November 3, 2008 Board of Veterans'
Appeals decision. The Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims held that the Board had
not issued a November 3, 2008 decision and that therefore it lacked jurisdiction over
Sabbia's appeal. 38 U.S.C. § 7266(a). 38 U.S.C. § 7266(a). Although that court had
not entered judgment by the date that the court received Sabbia's notice of appeal

<!-- PageBreak -->

seeking review by this court, it treated the document as filed on the date that it entered
judgment, i.e., December 1, 2009.

Under 38 U.S.C. § 7292, this court has limited jurisdiction over appeals from
decisions of the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims. See Forshey v. Principi, 284
F.3d 1335, 1338 (Fed. Cir. 2002) (en banc). This court "may not review (A) a challenge
to a factual determination, or (B) a challenge to a law or regulation as applied to the
facts of a particular case." 38 U.S.C. § 7292(d)(2).

The issue in this case is whether the Board of Veterans' Appeals had issued any
decision. That issue is a factual issue beyond this court's jurisdiction. Thus, this appeal
must be dismissed.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1)
This appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

(2)
The Secretary's motion for summary affirmance is denied.

(3)
Each side shall bear its own costs.

FOR THE COURT

MAR 23 2010

Date

/s/ Jan Horbaly
Jan Horbaly
Clerk

Cc:
Dominic Sabbia
Jessica R. Toplin, Esq.
$20

FILED
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR
THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT
MAR 2 3 2010

JAN HORBALY
CLERK

2010-7026

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.