The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
2010-7002•Arnett A. Bracy, Iii v. ERIC K. SHINSEKI, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
2010-7002Court of Appeals for the Federal CircuitDec 17, 2009
<!-- PageHeader="NOTE: This order is nonprecedential." -->
# United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
2010-7002
ARNETT A. BRACY, III,
Claimant-Appellant,
V.
ERIC K. SHINSEKI, Secretary of Veterans Affairs,
Respondent-Appellee.
ON MOTION
Appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims in
09-1873.
Before MICHEL, Chief Judge, SCHALL and LINN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM
## ORDER
The Secretary of Veterans Affairs moves to waive the requirements of Fed. Cir.
R. 27(f) and dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction.
Arnett A. Bracy, III sought review by the United States Court of Appeals for
Veterans Claims of a Board of Veterans' Appeals decision denying Bracy's claim for an
increased rating for a low back disability. The Board dismissed Bracy's appeal after he
failed to pay the filing fee or file a declaration of financial hardship and for failure to
respond to the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims' show cause order. Bracy
appealed to this court.
Under 38 U.S.C. § 7292, this court has limited jurisdiction over appeals from
decisions of the CAVC. See Forshey v. Principi, 284 F.3d 1335, 1338 (Fed. Cir. 2002)
(en banc). This court "may not review (A) a challenge to a factual determination, or (B)
<!-- PageBreak -->
a challenge to a law or regulation as applied to the facts of a particular case." 38 U.S.C.
§ 7292(d)(2).
In his informal brief, in response to the issue decided by the Court of Appeals for
Veterans Claims, Bracy argues that he "always return[s] all of my paperwork." Bracy
also argues that the Board erred in determining the facts related to his claim for an
increased disability rating. These are factual issues, outside of this court's jurisdiction.
Because Bracy fails to raise an issue within our jurisdiction, we must dismiss this
appeal.
Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED THAT:
(1)
The Secretary's motions are granted.
(2)
Each side shall bear its own costs.
FOR THE COURT
DEC 1 7 2009
Date
/s/ Jan Horbaly
Jan Horbaly
Clerk
PILED
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR
THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT
cc:
Arnett A. Bracy, III
Corrine A. Niosi, Esq.
s20
DEC 1 7 2009
ISSUED AS A MANDATE:
DEC 17 2009
JAN HORBALY
CLERK
<!-- PageFooter="2010-7002" -->
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.