The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
2010-1256•Flexiteek Americas, Inc. and Flexiteek International As v. Plasteak, Inc. and Plasdeck, Inc.
2010-1256Court of Appeals for the Federal CircuitMay 27, 2011
# NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
FLEXITEEK AMERICAS, INC. AND FLEXITEEK
INTERNATIONAL AS,
Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
PLASTEAK, INC. AND PLASDECK, INC.,
Defendants-Appellants,
AND
ANDRE BATISTA,
Defendant.
2010-1256
Appeal from the United States District Court for the
Southern District of Florida in case no. 08-CV-60996,
Judge James I. Cohn.
ON MOTION
Before GAJARSA, MAYER, and PROST, Circuit Judges.
GAJARSA, Circuit Judge.
ORDER
<!-- PageBreak -->
<!-- PageHeader="FLEXITEEK AMERICAS v. PLASTEAK INC" -->
This court directed the parties to respond whether
PlasTEAK, Inc. and PlasDECK, Inc.'s (PlasTEAK) appeal
from the February 5, 2010 order of the United States
District Court for the Southern District of Florida granting
a permanent injunction should be dismissed as moot in
light of the district court's subsequent July 20, 2010 order
terminating the permanent injunction. Flexiteek Americas,
Inc. and Flexiteek International AS (Flexiteek) respond
and argue that this appeal is moot. The appellant,
PlasTEAK, argues that this appeal is not moot.
PlasTEAK urges this court not to dismiss the appeal
arguing that the appeal should continue to resolve its
concerns regarding liability for infractions of the injunction
between issuance of the injunction and the court's termina-
tion order. Although that issue might present a case or
controversy, it does not do so here. This appeal is of the
district court's injunction, which is no longer in effect, and
not of any possible order for contempt. Notably, even if
PlasTEAK were to prevail in this appeal, that would not
necessarily dispose of any question as to contempt of an
injunction. See generally Emery Air Frieght Corp. v. Local
Union 295, 449 F.2d 586, 591 (2d Cir. 1971) ("Accordingly,
the preliminary injunction as granted was improper.
However, this conclusion does not dispose of the question of
contempt, to which we now turn.").
Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED THAT:
(1) This appeal is dismissed.
(2) Each side shall bear its own costs.
<!-- PageBreak -->
FLEXITEEK AMERICAS v. PLASTEAK INC
FOR THE COURT
MAY 2 7 2011
Date
/s/ Jan Horbaly
Jan Horbaly
Clerk
cc: S. Tracy Long, Esq.
Bruce H. Wilson, Esq.
s19
FILED
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR
THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT
MAY 2 7 2011
JAN HORBALY
CLERK
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.