The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
2010-1061•Diep X. Hoang v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc., Katherine Green, Kenneth A. Wilson, Maurizo…
2010-1061Court of Appeals for the Federal CircuitMay 3, 2010
<!-- PageHeader="NOTE: This order is nonprecedential." -->
# United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
2010-1061
DIEP X. HOANG,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
V.
ABBOTT LABORATORIES, INC., KATHERINE GREEN,
KENNETH A. WILSON, MAURIZO ACQUASALIENTE,
STEPHEN MONTGOMERY, ZHENKUN MA, LY TAM PHAN,
SUOMING ZHANG, STEVAN W. DJURIC, YAT SUN OR,
and SANJAY CHEMBURKAR,
Defendant-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois in case
no. 08-CV-0189, Judge Matthew F. Kennelly.
ON MOTION
Before MAYER, LOURIE, and BRYSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
## ORDER
Diep X. Hoang moves for an extension of time to file a brief. Abbott Laboratories,
Inc. et al. oppose and move to dismiss this appeal.
On December 17, 2009, this court granted Hoang's motion for an extension of
time, giving her until February 12, 2010 to file her brief. The court's order noted that
Hoang should not anticipate further extensions. On March 1, 2010, the court granted
Hoang's motion for an additional 30-day extension. The court's order noted that "[n]o
further extensions will be granted." Nevertheless, Hoang has not yet filed her brief and
yet again asks for additional time to file her opening brief.
<!-- PageBreak -->
This court meant what it said in its order that "no further extensions will be
granted." Hoang did not file a brief on the court-ordered due date and her appeal must
be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Julien v. Zeringue, 864 F.2d 1572, 1574 (Fed.
Cir. 1989) ("failure to comply with this court's rules, including the requirements for
preparing and filing briefs, appendices and other papers, may result in dismissal of an
appeal for failure to prosecute").
Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED THAT:
(1)
The motion for an extension of time is denied.
(2)
The motion to dismiss is granted.
(3)
Each side shall bear their own costs.
FOR THE COURT
MAY 0 3 2010
/s/ Jan Horbaly
Date
Jan Horbaly
Clerk
cc:
Diep X. Hoang
James F. Hurst, Esq.
s19
ISSUED AS A MANDATE:
MAY 0 3 2010
FILED
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR
THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT
MAY 03 2010
JAN HORBALY
CLERK
2010-1061
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.