The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
2009-7115•Carl L. Ware v. ERIC K. SHINSEKI, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
2009-7115Court of Appeals for the Federal CircuitOct 9, 2009
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.
# United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
2009-7115
CARL L. WARE
Claimant-Appellant,
V.
ERIC K. SHINSEKI, Secretary of Veterans Affairs,
Respondent-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims in 07-2573, Judge
Ronald M. Holdaway.
ON MOTION
Before LOURIE, FRIEDMAN, and GAJARSA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
## ORDER
The Secretary of Veterans Affairs moves to waive the requirements of Fed. Cir.
R. 27(f) and to dismiss Carl L. Ware's appeal from the United States Court of Appeals
for Veterans Claims' judgment in Ware v. Shinseki, 07-2573, for lack of jurisdiction.
Ware sought review by the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims of a Board of
Veterans' Appeals decision denying Ware's claim for an earlier effective date for service
connection due to paranoid schizophrenia. In its decision, the Board determined that
Ware was not entitled to an earlier effective date based on an earlier claim because
Ware did not allege that the Board's decision on the earlier claim was based on clear
and unmistakable error. Ware appeals to this court.
Under 38 U.S.C. § 7292, this court has limited jurisdiction over appeals from
decisions of the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims. See Forshey v. Principi, 284
<!-- PageBreak -->
F.3d 1335, 1338 (Fed. Cir. 2002) (en banc). This court "may not review (A) a challenge
to a factual determination, or (B) a challenge to a law or regulation as applied to the
facts of a particular case." 38 U.S.C. § 7292(d)(2).
In his informal brief, Ware only argues that the Board failed to properly weigh the
medical evidence related to his schizophrenia in denying his claim for an earlier
effective date for service connection. Because Ware fails to raise an issue within our
jurisdiction, we must dismiss this appeal.
Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED THAT:
(1)
The Secretary's motions are granted. The appeal is dismissed.
(2)
Each side shall bear its own costs.
FOR THE COURT
OCT 0 9 2009
Date
/s/ Jan Horbaly
Jan Horbaly
Clerk
PILED
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR
THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT
Cc:
Carl L. Ware
Scott A. MacGriff, Esq.
$20
ISSUED AS A MANDATE:
OCT 0 9 2009
OCT 09 2009
JAN HORBALY
CLERK
<!-- PageFooter="2009-7035" -->
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.