The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
2009-1542•DAVE D. PROBERT and JACKLYN O. PROBERT v. the Clorox Company
2009-1542Court of Appeals for the Federal CircuitSep 29, 2009
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.
# United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
2009-1542
DAVE D. PROBERT and JACKLYN O. PROBERT,
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
V.
THE CLOROX COMPANY,
Defendant-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Utah
in case no. 07-CV-139, Judge Dee Benson.
ON MOTION
ORDER
The parties move jointly to dismiss this appeal."
Upon consideration thereof,
IT IS ORDERED THAT:
(1)
The motion is granted.
(2)
Each side shall bear its own costs.
FOR THE COURT
SEP 2 9 2009
Date
/s/ Jan Horbaly
Jan Horbaly
Clerk
cc:
Todd E. Zenger, Esq.
Clinton Earl Duke, Esq.
s17
PILED
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR
THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT
SEP 2 9 2009
ISSUED AS A MANDATE:
SEP 2 9 2009
JAN HORBALY
CLERK
\*
The parties request that this dismissal be with prejudice; however, it is not
the practice of this court to dismiss with or without prejudice.
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.