The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
2007-1522•Sanofi-Aventis, Sanofi-Synthelabo, Inc. v. Cobalt Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
2007-1522Court of Appeals for the Federal CircuitNov 9, 2009
<!-- PageHeader="NOTE: This order is nonprecedential." -->
# United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
2007-1522
SANOFI-AVENTIS, SANOFI-SYNTHELABO, INC., and
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB SANOFI
PHARMACEUTICALS HOLDING PARTNERSHIP,
Plaintiffs-Appellees,
V.
COBALT PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.,
Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of
New York in case no. 05-CV-08055, Judge Sidney H. Stein.
ON MOTION
Before MAYER, CLEVENGER, and RADER, Circuit Judge.
MAYER, Circuit Judge.
## ORDER
Sanofi-Aventis et al. (Sanofi) move for panel review and reconsideration pursuant
to Fed. Cir. R. 27(1) of the court's July 21, 2009 order denying Sanofi's motion for
issuance of the mandate. Cobalt Pharmaceuticals, Inc. responds and states that it
"does not oppose, and hereby consents, to entry of judgment in this appeal in
accordance with and based on this Court's decision in Sanofi-Synthelabo v. Apotex Inc.,
2007-1438, with each side to bear its own costs."
This appeal was stayed pending the court's disposition of Sanofi v. Apotex, 2007-
1438. In Apotex, the court affirmed the district court's ruling that Sanofi's patent was not
invalid. Because the parties now agree that the judgment of the district court in this
case should be summarily affirmed, the court grants the motion for reconsideration.
<!-- PageBreak -->
Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED THAT:
(1)
The motion for panel review is granted.
(2)
The motion for reconsideration is granted. The judgment of the United
States District Court for the Southern District of New York is summarily affirmed and the
mandate is issued herewith.
(3)
Each side shall bear its own costs.
FOR THE COURT
NOV 0 9 2009
/s/ Jan Horbaly
Date
Jan Horbaly
Clerk
cc:
Evan R. Chesler, Esq.
William A. Rakoczy, Esq.
$17
ISSUED AS A MANDATE:
NOV 0 9 2009
PILED
U.8. COURT OF APPEALS FOR
THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT
NOV 0 9 2009
JAN HORBALY
CLERK
<!-- PageFooter="2007-1522" -->
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.