Raffel Systems, LLC v. Man Wah Holdings Limited

20-2126Court of Appeals for the Federal CircuitJun 10, 2021

Full text

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
______________________
RAFFEL SYSTEMS, LLC,
Appellant
v.
MAN WAH HOLDINGS LIMITED,
Appellee
______________________
2020-2126
______________________
Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark
Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. PGR2019-
00029.
______________________
Decided: June 10, 2021
______________________
JOHN C. SCHELLER , Michael Best & Friedrich, LLP,
Madison, WI, for appellant. Also represented by M ICHAEL
BESS , BRIANNA JANE SIEBKEN , CHICAGO , IL; D AVID A.
CASIMIR, T YLER SISK , Casimir Jones, S.C., Middleton, WI.
G ARY H NATH , Mayer Brown LLP, Washington, DC, for
appellee. Also represented by CLARK B AKEWELL, M ICHAEL
LOUIS L INDINGER , M INH NGUYEN -D ANG , N ICOLE A.
SAHARSKY ; H AO TAN , SHEN WANG , Arch & Lake LLP, Chi-
cago, IL.
Case: 20-2126 Document: 40 Page: 1 Filed: 06/10/2021

-- 1 of 2 --

RAFFEL SYSTEMS , LLC v. MAN WAH HOLDINGS LIMITED 2
______________________
Before REYNA, H UGHES , and STOLL, Circuit Judges.
PER C URIAM.
Raffel Systems, LLC appeals the decision of the Patent
Trial and Appeal Board concluding that claim 1 of U.S. Pa-
tent No. D821,986 is unpatentable under the on-sale bar.
The Board found that an email sent by patent owner Raffel
offered for sale an embodiment of the claim in small quan-
tities on-demand over a year before the priority date of the
patent. We have considered the appellant’s arguments that
the Board’s on-sale determination was unsupported by sub-
stantial evidence and find them unpersuasive. We there-
fore affirm.
AFFIRMED
Case: 20-2126 Document: 40 Page: 2 Filed: 06/10/2021

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.