The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
20-1513•Dak Americas LLC, Auriga Polymers Inc. v. United States
20-1513Court of Appeals for the Federal CircuitNov 10, 2020
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
______________________
DAK AMERICAS LLC, AURIGA POLYMERS INC.,
Plaintiffs-Appellants
v.
UNITED STATES,
Defendant-Appellee
______________________
2020-1513
______________________
Appeal from the United States Court of International
Trade in No. 1:17-cv-00195-TCS, Chief Judge Timothy C.
Stanceu.
______________________
Decided: November 10, 2020
______________________
P
AUL C. ROSENTHAL, Kelley Drye & Warren, LLP,
Washington, DC, argued for plaintiffs-appellants. Also
represented by CAMERON R. ARGETSINGER, JOSHUA MOREY,
DAVID C. SMITH, JR.
MIKKI COTTET, Appellate Staff, Civil Division, United
States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, argued for
defendant-appellee. Also represented by J
EFFREY B.
CLARK, JEANNE DAVIDSON, FRANKLIN E. WHITE, JR.;
SUZANNA HARTZELL-BALLARD, Office of Assistant Chief
Case: 20-1513 Document: 45 Page: 1 Filed: 11/10/2020
DAK AMERICAS LLC v. UNITED STATES
2
Counsel, United States Customs and Border Protection, In-
dianapolis, IN.
______________________
Before D
YK, TARANTO, and STOLL, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
Without reaching the question whether the demand
letters at issue here constitute final agency action, the
Court finds that appellants have failed to show that, on the
merits, the decision by the Court of International Trade
was erroneous.
AFFIRMED
Case: 20-1513 Document: 45 Page: 2 Filed: 11/10/2020
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.