Alexsam, Inc. v. Healthequity, Inc.

20-146Court of Appeals for the Federal CircuitOct 14, 2020

Full text

N
OTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
______________________
ALEXSAM, INC.,
Plaintiff-Respondent

v.

HEALTHEQUITY, INC.,
Defendant-Petitioner
______________________

2020-146
______________________

On Petition for Permission to Appeal pursuant to 28
U.S.C. Section 1292(b) from the United States District
Court for the District of Utah in No. 2:19-cv-00445-HCN-
CMR, Judge Howard C. Nielson, Jr.
______________________

ON PETITION
______________________
Before R
EYNA, WALLACH, and CHEN, Circuit Judges.
REYNA, Circuit Judge.
O R D E R
HealthEquity, Inc. petitions for permission to appeal
from an interlocutory order of the United States District
Court for the District of Utah denying its motion to dis-
miss, which the district court certified pursuant to 28
U.S.C. § 1292(b). AlexSam, Inc. opposes the petition.
Case: 20-146 Document: 14 Page: 1 Filed: 10/14/2020

ALEXSAM, INC. v. HEALTHEQUITY, INC.
2
Under § 1292(b), a district court may certify that an
order that is not otherwise appealable is one involving a
controlling question of law as to which there is substan-
tial ground for difference of opinion and for which an
immediate appeal may materially advance the ultimate
termination of the litigation. Ultimately, this court must
exercise its own discretion in deciding whether to grant
permission to appeal an interlocutory order. See In re
Convertible Rowing Exerciser Pat.Litig., 903 F.2d 822, 822
(Fed. Cir. 1990). In this case, we conclude that we should
not permit an interlocutory appeal.
Accordingly,
I
T IS ORDERED THAT:
The petition for permission to appeal is denied.

October 14, 2020
Date
FOR THE COURT

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner
Peter R. Marksteiner
Clerk of Court
s31

Case: 20-146 Document: 14 Page: 2 Filed: 10/14/2020

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.