The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
19-1693•Andres Caceres-Solari v. United States
19-1693Court of Appeals for the Federal CircuitFeb 7, 2020
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
______________________
ANDRES CACERES-SOLARI,
Plaintiff-Appellant
v.
UNITED STATES,
Defendant-Appellee
______________________
2019-1693
______________________
Appeal from the United States Court of Federal Claims
in No. 1:18-cv-00539-EJD, Senior Judge Edward J.
Damich.
______________________
JUDGMENT
______________________
W
ILLIAM CASSARA, Cassara Law Office, Evans, GA, ar-
gued for plaintiff-appellant.
SONIA W. MURPHY, Commercial Litigation Branch,
Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Wash-
ington, DC, argued for defendant-appellee. Also repre-
sented by J
OSEPH H. HUNT, STEVEN JOHN GILLINGHAM,
ROBERT EDWARD KIRSCHMAN, JR.
______________________
Case: 19-1693 Document: 35 Page: 1 Filed: 02/07/2020
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
P
ER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, O’MALLEY and
REYNA, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
February 7, 2020 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner
Date Peter R. Marksteiner
Clerk of Court
Case: 19-1693 Document: 35 Page: 2 Filed: 02/07/2020
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.