The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
19-1235•Personal Beasties Group LLC v. Nike, Inc.
19-1235Court of Appeals for the Federal CircuitFeb 10, 2020
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
______________________
PERSONAL BEASTIES GROUP LLC,
Plaintiff-Appellant
v.
NIKE, INC.,
Defendant-Appellee
______________________
2019-1235
______________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the
Southern District of New York in No. 1:18-cv-00516-JGK,
Judge John G. Koeltl.
______________________
JUDGMENT
______________________
C
RAIG UHRICH, Uhrich Law Firm, P.A., Oakley, KS, ar-
gued for plaintiff-appellant. Also argued by ERIK JAMES
DYKEMA, Upshaw PLLC, Essex Fells, NJ.
STANLEY JOSEPH PANIKOWSKI, III, DLA Piper LLP (US),
San Diego, CA, argued for defendant-appellee. Also repre-
sented by RICHARD T. MULLOY, EDWARD SIKORSKI.
______________________
T
HIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
Case: 19-1235 Document: 43 Page: 1 Filed: 02/10/2020
O
RDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (DYK, TARANTO, and STOLL, Circuit
Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
February 10, 2020 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner
Date Peter R. Marksteiner
Clerk of Court
Case: 19-1235 Document: 43 Page: 2 Filed: 02/10/2020
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.