The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
19-1145•Blackberry Ltd. v. Google LLC
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
______________________
BLACKBERRY LTD.,
Appellant
v.
GOOGLE LLC,
Appellee
______________________
2019-1145
______________________
Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark
Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2017-
00913.
______________________
JUDGMENT
______________________
C
HING-LEE FUKUDA, Sidley Austin LLP, New York,
NY, argued for appellant. Also represented by SHARON
LEE; SAMUEL DILLON, Washington, DC.
NAVEEN MODI, Paul Hastings LLP, Washington, DC,
argued for appellee. Also represented by PHILLIP W.
CITROEN, STEPHEN BLAKE KINNAIRD, SEONGHEE EMILY LEE,
JOSEPH PALYS.
______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, MOORE and
H
UGHES, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
January 13, 2020 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner
Date Peter R. Marksteiner
Clerk of Court
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.