The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
18-2131•Daicel Corporation v. Celanese International Corporation
18-2131Court of Appeals for the Federal CircuitNov 8, 2019
N OTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
______________________
DAICEL CORPORATION,
Appellant
v.
CELANESE INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION,
Appellee
______________________
2018-2131
______________________
Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark
Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2017-
00166.
______________________
JUDGMENT
______________________
EUGENE P EREZ, Birch Stewart Kolasch & Birch, LLP,
Falls Church, VA, argued for appellant. Also represented
by G ERALD MYERS MURPHY , J R.
CHARLES COLLINS -CHASE, Finnegan, Washington, DC,
argued for appellee. Also represented by C. COLLETTE
CORSER , M ICHAEL J. F LIBBERT ; J USTIN L EONARD K RIEGER,
Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP, Denver, CO.
______________________
-- 1 of 2 --
T HIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
O RDERED and ADJUDGED:
P ER CURIAM (L OURIE, REYNA, and WALLACH , Circuit
Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY O RDER OF THE COURT
November 8, 2019 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner
Date Peter R. Marksteiner
Clerk of Court
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.