Daicel Corporation v. Celanese International Corporation

18-2130Court of Appeals for the Federal CircuitNov 8, 2019

Full text

N OTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
______________________
DAICEL CORPORATION,
Appellant
v.
CELANESE INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION,
Appellee
______________________
2018-2130
______________________
Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark
Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2017-
00165.
______________________
JUDGMENT
______________________
G ERALD MYERS M URPHY , J R., Birch Stewart Kolasch &
Birch, LLP, Falls Church, VA, argued for appellant. Also
represented by EUGENE P EREZ.
CHARLES COLLINS -CHASE, Finnegan, Washington, DC,
argued for appellee. Also represented by C. COLLETTE
CORSER , M ICHAEL J. F LIBBERT ; J USTIN L EONARD K RIEGER,
Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP, Denver, CO.
______________________

-- 1 of 2 --

T HIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
O RDERED and ADJUDGED:
P ER CURIAM (L OURIE, REYNA, and WALLACH , Circuit
Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY O RDER OF THE COURT
November 8, 2019 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner
Date Peter R. Marksteiner
Clerk of Court

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.