Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd., Huawei Device USA, Inc., Huawei Technologies USA, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America Inc.

N OTE: This order is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
______________________
HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD., HUAWEI
DEVICE USA, INC., HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES
USA, INC.,
Plaintiffs / Counterclaim Defendants-Appellants
HISILICON TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD.,
Counterclaim Defendant
v.
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., SAMSUNG
ELECTRONICS AMERICA INC.,
Defendants / Counterclaimants-Appellee
SAMSUNG RESEARCH AMERICA,
Defendant-Appellee
______________________
2018-1979
______________________
Appeal from the U.S. District Court for the Northern
District of California, No. 3:16-cv-02787-WHO, Judge Wil-
liam H. Orrick, III.
______________________
ON MOTION
______________________

-- 1 of 2 --

HUAWEI TECHS. CO., LTD. V. SAMSUNG ELECS. CO., LTD. 2
Before P ROST , Chief Judge, O’MALLEY and HUGHES , Cir-
cuit Judges.
P ER CURIAM .
O R D E R
The appellants, Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.,
Huawei Device USA, Inc., and Huawei Technologies USA,
Inc., have moved to dismiss this appeal and remand the
case to the district court. The appellees, Samsung Elec-
tronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America Inc., and
Samsung Research America, do not oppose the motion.
The motion is granted, in part.
The case is remanded to the district court for the lim-
ited purpose of considering Huawei’s motion for vacatur.
This court takes no position regarding the merits of that
motion.
The appeal will be held in abeyance pending the reso-
lution of the motion for vacatur by the district court. Pur-
suant to FRAP 12.1(b), the parties are directed to notify the
Clerk of the Court within fourteen days of entry of the dis-
trict court’s decision regarding the motion for vacatur.
F OR THE COURT
March 15, 2019 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner
Date Peter R. Marksteiner
Clerk of Court

-- 2 of 2 --