The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
18-1903•Corning Optical Communications LLC v. Panduit Corp.
18-1903Court of Appeals for the Federal CircuitAug 8, 2019
N OTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
______________________
CORNING OPTICAL COMMUNICATIONS LLC,
Appellant
v.
PANDUIT CORP.,
Appellee
______________________
2018-1903, 2018-1905, 2018-2058
______________________
Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark
Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2016-
01703, IPR2016-01709, IPR2017-00029.
______________________
JUDGMENT
______________________
J ASON M. WILCOX , Kirkland & Ellis LLP, Washington,
DC, argued for appellant. Also represented by J OHN C.
O'Q UINN, HANNAH L AUREN BEDARD; ERIC D AVID HAYES ,
Chicago, IL.
J OHN J. MOLENDA , Steptoe & Johnson, LLP, New York,
NY, argued for appellee. Also represented by ROBERT
G REENFELD; K ELLY J. EBERSPECHER , D ANIEL STEVEN
STRINGFIELD, Chicago, IL; K ATHERINE D OROTHY CAPPAERT ,
Washington, DC.
-- 1 of 2 --
______________________
T HIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
O RDERED and ADJUDGED:
P ER CURIAM (L OURIE, P LAGER, and O’MALLEY , Cir-
cuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY O RDER OF THE COURT
August 8, 2019 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner
Date Peter R. Marksteiner
Clerk of Court
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.