Uniloc USA, Inc., Uniloc Luxembourg S.a. v. E-Mds, Inc., Adelaware Corporation, Meridianemr, Inc., Healthtronics, Inc., Endo…

N OTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
______________________
UNILOC USA, INC., UNILOC LUXEMBOURG S.A.,
Plaintiffs-Appellants
v.
E-MDS, INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION,
MERIDIANEMR, INC., HEALTHTRONICS, INC.,
ENDO HEALTH SOLUTIONS INC., ALTARIS
CAPITAL PARTNERS LLC, MEDHOST,
INC., COMPUTER PROGRAMS AND SYSTEMS,
INC., E-MDS, INC., A TEXAS
CORPORATION, HEALTHTRONICS
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS, INC.,
AMERISOURCEBERGEN CORPORATION,
AMERISOURCEBERGEN HOLDING
CORPORATION, INTUITIVE MEDICAL
SOFTWARE, LLC, ALTARIS HEALTH
PARTNERS II, L.P., ALTARIS HEALTH PARTNERS
III, L.P., AHP-HT II ACQUISITION
COMPANY, LLC, AHP-HT III ACQUISITION
COMPANY, LLC, INTERNATIONAL
ONCOLOGY NETWORK SOLUTIONS, INC.,
SIEMENS MEDICAL SOLUTIONS USA,
INC., AMERISOURCEBERGEN SPECIALTY
GROUP, INC., VISTA EQUITY
PARTNERS FUND IV, LIGHTNING ACQUISITION,
LLC, EPIC HOSTING, LLC, EPIC
SYSTEMS CORPORATION, CERNER HEALTH
SERVICES, INC., GENERAL

-- 1 of 3 --

UNILOC USA INC. v. E- MDS, INC. 2
ELECTRIC COMPANY, DBA GE HEALTHCARE,
ALLSCRIPTS HEALTHCARE SOLUTIONS,
INC., CERNER CORPORATION, LIGHTNING
HOLDINGS, LLC, GREENWAY
HEALTH, INC., GREENWAY HEALTH, LLC,
GREENWAY MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
Defendants
______________________
2018-1893
______________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the
Eastern District of Texas in No. 6:14-cv-00625-RWS, Judge
Robert Schroeder, III.
______________________
Decided: February 8, 2019
______________________
BRETT MANGRUM , Etheridge Law Group, Southlake,
TX, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by
RYAN L OVELESS , J IM ETHERIDGE .
______________________
Before M OORE, WALLACH , and HUGHES , Circuit Judges.
P ER CURIAM .
Plaintiffs-Appellants sued Defendants for infringe-
ment of U.S. Patent Nos. 5,628,526 and 5,715,451. Defend-
ants moved to dismiss on ineligibility grounds, and the
district court partially granted this motion. Plaintiffs-Ap-
pellants and Defendants subsequently settled their dispute
and jointly stipulated to dismissal of the case. Plaintiffs-
Appellants did not reserve the right to appeal. Accord-
ingly, we dismiss this appeal for mootness pursuant to
Aqua Marine Supply v. AIM Machining, Inc., 247 F.3d
1216, 1218–20 (Fed. Cir. 2001).

-- 2 of 3 --

UNILOC USA INC. v. E- MDS, INC. 3
DISMISSED

-- 3 of 3 --