The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
18-1752•Dexcom, Inc. v. Waveform Technologies, Inc.
18-1752Court of Appeals for the Federal CircuitApr 3, 2019
N OTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
______________________
DEXCOM, INC.,
Appellant
v.
WAVEFORM TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
Appellee
______________________
2018-1752, 2018-1753
______________________
Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark
Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2016-
01679, IPR2016-01680.
______________________
JUDGMENT
______________________
G REGORY A. CASTANIAS , Jones Day, Washington, DC,
argued for appellant. Also represented by D AVID B.
COCHRAN, CALVIN G RIFFITH , Cleveland, OH; MATTHEW
J OHNSON, J OSHUA R. N IGHTINGALE, Pittsburgh, PA; SCOTT
E. D AVIS , J OHN D. VANDENBERG, Klarquist Sparkman,
LLP, Portland, OR.
SCOTT D. EADS , Schwabe, Williamson & Wyatt, Port-
land, OR, argued for appellee. Also represented by
-- 1 of 2 --
N ICHOLAS (N IKA) F REMONT ALDRICH , J R., SARA K OBAK,
J ASON A DAM WRUBLESKI.
______________________
T HIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
O RDERED and ADJUDGED:
P ER CURIAM (D YK, CLEVENGER , and O’MALLEY , Cir-
cuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY O RDER OF THE COURT
April 3, 2019 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner
Date Peter R. Marksteiner
Clerk of Court
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.