The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
17-2296•Digital Ally, Inc. v. Taser International, Inc.
17-2296Court of Appeals for the Federal CircuitMay 2, 2018
N OTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
______________________
DIGITAL ALLY, INC.,
Plaintiff-Appellant
v.
TASER INTERNATIONAL, INC.,
Defendant-Appellee
______________________
2017-2296
______________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the
District of Kansas in No. 2:16-cv-02032-CM-TJJ, Judge
Carlos Murguia.
______________________
JUDGMENT
______________________
J AMES F.B. D ANIELS , McDowell, Rice, Smith & Bu-
chanan, PC, Kansas City, MO, argued for plaintiff-
appellant.
P AMELA BETH P ETERSEN, Axon Enterprise, Inc.,
Scottsdale, AZ, argued for defendant-appellee. Also
represented by J OHN D. G ARRETSON, L YNN C. HERNDON,
Shook, Hardy & Bacon, LLP, Kansas City, MO.
______________________
-- 1 of 2 --
T HIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
O RDERED and A DJUDGED:
P ER CURIAM (WALLACH , MAYER , and T ARANTO, Circuit
Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY O RDER OF THE COURT
May 2, 2018 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner
Date Peter R. Marksteiner
Clerk of Court
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.