Uniloc USA, Inc., Uniloc Luxembourg S.a. v. Picis, Inc., Quadramed Corporation, N. Harris Computer Corp., Optuminsight, Inc.,…

N OTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
______________________
UNILOC USA, INC., UNILOC LUXEMBOURG S.A.,
Plaintiffs-Appellants
v.
PICIS, INC., QUADRAMED CORPORATION, N.
HARRIS COMPUTER CORP., OPTUMINSIGHT,
INC., NETSMART TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
Defendants-Appellees
PRACTICE FUSION, INC.,
Defendant
______________________
2017-2171
______________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the
Eastern District of Texas in Nos. 6:16-cv-00463-RWS, 6:16-
cv-00465-RWS, 6:16-cv-00466-RWS, 6:16-cv-00467-RWS,
6:16-cv-00468-RWS, 6:16-cv-00470-RWS, 6:16-cv-00471-
RWS, 6:16-cv-00472-RWS, Judge Robert Schroeder, III.
______________________
JUDGMENT
______________________
BRETT MANGRUM , Etheridge Law Group, Southlake,
TX, argued for plaintiffs-appellants. Also represented by
RYAN S. L OVELESS , J AMES ETHERIDGE .

-- 1 of 2 --

HARNAIK S. K AHLON, Riley Safer Holmes & Cancila,
Chicago, IL, argued for all defendants-appellees. Defend-
ant-appellee Netsmart Technologies, Inc. also represented
by ASHLEY T AYLOR CORBITT .
MICHAEL A. ALBERT , Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, PC,
Boston, MA, for defendants-appellees Picis, Inc., Quadra-
Med Corporation, N. Harris Computer Corp. Also repre-
sented by HUNTER D. K EETON, MARIE MCK IERNAN, AUSTIN
STEELMAN.
P ETER J. CHASSMAN, Reed Smith, Houston, TX, for de-
fendant-appellee OptumInsight, Inc.
______________________
T HIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
O RDERED and ADJUDGED:
P ER CURIAM (MOORE, WALLACH , and H UGHES , Circuit
Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY O RDER OF THE COURT
February 8, 2019 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner
Date Peter R. Marksteiner
Clerk of Court

-- 2 of 2 --