The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
17-2154•Blue Cross and Blue Shield of North Carolina v. United States
17-2154Court of Appeals for the Federal CircuitJul 9, 2018
N OTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
______________________
BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD OF NORTH
CAROLINA,
Plaintiff-Appellant
v.
UNITED STATES,
Defendant-Appellee
______________________
2017-2154
______________________
Appeal from the United States Court of Federal
Claims in No. 1:16-cv-00651-LKG, Judge Lydia Kay
Griggsby.
______________________
Decided: July 9, 2018
______________________
L AWRENCE SHER, Reed Smith LLP, Washington, DC,
for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by K YLE RICHARD
BAHR, J AMES CHRISTOPHER MARTIN, C ONOR MICHAEL
SHAFFER, COLIN E. W RABLEY , Pittsburgh, PA.
ALISA BETH K LEIN, Appellate Staff, Civil Division,
United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC,
for defendant-appellee. Also represented by MARK B.
STERN, CHAD A. READLER.
-- 1 of 2 --
BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD v. UNITED STATES 2
______________________
Before P ROST , Chief Judge, N EWMAN and M OORE,
Circuit Judges.
P ROST , Chief Judge.
For the reasons stated in our decisions in Moda
Health Plan, Inc. v. United States, 17-1994, and Land of
Lincoln Mutual Health Insurance Co. v. United States, 17-
1224, and consistent with the statement of appellant Blue
Cross and Blue Shield of North Carolina, we affirm.
Appellant’s motion for entry of judgment and previous
motions to allow argument are denied as moot.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.