The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
17-1084•James B. Goodman v. Smart Modular Technologies, Inc.
17-1084Court of Appeals for the Federal CircuitOct 5, 2017
N OTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
______________________
JAMES B. GOODMAN,
Plaintiff-Appellant
v.
SMART MODULAR TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
Defendant-Appellee
______________________
2017-1084
______________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the
Southern District of Texas in No. 4:14-cv-01380, Judge
Gray H. Miller.
______________________
JUDGMENT
______________________
D AVID F INK, Fink & Johnson, Houston, TX, argued for
plaintiff-appellant.
MICHAEL F RANCIS H EAFEY , Troutman Sanders LLP,
San Francisco, CA, argued for defendant-appellee. Also
represented by ANUP M. SHAH , Charlotte, NC.
______________________
T HIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
-- 1 of 2 --
O RDERED and A DJUDGED:
P ER CURIAM (MOORE, P LAGER , and CHEN, Circuit
Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY O RDER OF THE COURT
October 5, 2017 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner
Date Peter R. Marksteiner
Clerk of Court
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.