The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
16-1990•Susan Stanford v. United States
16-1990Court of Appeals for the Federal CircuitJul 19, 2017
N OTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
______________________
SUSAN STANFORD,
Plaintiff-Appellant
v.
UNITED STATES,
Defendant-Appellee
______________________
2016-1990
______________________
Appeal from the United States Court of Federal
Claims in No. 1:15-cv-00123-SGB, Chief Judge Susan G.
Braden.
______________________
JUDGMENT
______________________
MICHAEL D. SYDOW, SR., The Sydow Firm, Houston,
TX, argued for plaintiff-appellant.
MARIANA T ERESA A CEVEDO, Commercial Litigation
Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of
Justice, Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellee.
Also represented by BENJAMIN C. MIZER, ROBERT E.
K IRSCHMAN, J R., BRIAN A. MIZOGUCHI.
______________________
-- 1 of 2 --
T HIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
O RDERED and A DJUDGED:
P ER CURIAM (P ROST , Chief Judge, N EWMAN and L INN,
Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY O RDER OF THE COURT
July 19, 2017 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner
Date Peter R. Marksteiner
Clerk of Court
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.