The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
16-1664•Cao Group, Inc. v. Biolase Technology, Inc.
16-1664Court of Appeals for the Federal CircuitJan 27, 2017
N OTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
______________________
CAO GROUP, INC.,
Appellant
v.
BIOLASE TECHNOLOGY, INC.,
Appellee
______________________
2016-1664
______________________
Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark
Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 95/002,271.
______________________
JUDGMENT
______________________
H. D ICKSON BURTON, TraskBritt, PC, Salt Lake City,
UT, argued for appellant. Also represented by J. J EFFREY
G UNN, STEPHEN E. P ULLEY .
J OSHUA L EE RASKIN, Greenberg Traurig LLP, New
York, NY, argued for appellee.
______________________
T HIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
O RDERED and A DJUDGED:
-- 1 of 2 --
P ER CURIAM (N EWMAN, MOORE, and WALLACH , Circuit
Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY O RDER OF THE COURT
January 27, 2017 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner
Date Peter R. Marksteiner
Clerk of Court
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.