The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
16-1407•Voestalpine Stahl Gmbh v. Arcelormittal
16-1407Court of Appeals for the Federal CircuitOct 11, 2016
N OTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
______________________
VOESTALPINE STAHL GMBH,
Appellant
v.
ARCELORMITTAL,
Appellee
______________________
2016-1407
______________________
Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark
Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. 95/001,214,
95/001,350, 95/001,353.
______________________
JUDGMENT
______________________
MAXWELL J AMES P ETERSEN, Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard
& Smith, LLP, Chicago, IL, argued for appellant.
D AVID J AMES C USHING, Sughrue Mion, PLLC, Wash-
ington, DC, argued for appellee. Also represented by
RICHARD CLAY T URNER; MARK J AMES D EBOY , Edell
Shapiro and Finnan, Gaithersburg, MD.
______________________
T HIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
-- 1 of 2 --
O RDERED and A DJUDGED:
P ER CURIAM (N EWMAN, L OURIE, and CLEVENGER ,
Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY O RDER OF THE COURT
October 11, 2016 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner
Date Peter R. Marksteiner
Clerk of Court
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.