The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
16-1229•Datatreasury Corporation v. Fiserv, Inc.
16-1229Court of Appeals for the Federal CircuitOct 13, 2016
N OTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
______________________
DATATREASURY CORPORATION,
Appellant
v.
FISERV, INC.,
Appellee
______________________
2016-1229, 2016-1230
______________________
Appeals from the United States Patent and Trade-
mark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos.
CBM2014-00087, CBM2014-00088.
______________________
Decided: October 13, 2016
______________________
EDWARD K. CHIN, Albritton Law Firm, Longview, TX,
argued for appellant. Also represented by D EREK T OD
G ILLILAND, Nix Patterson & Roach LLP, Daingerfield, TX;
CHRISTIAN J OHN H URT , Dallas, TX.
D AVID ALAN ROODMAN, Bryan Cave LLP, St. Louis,
MO, argued for appellee. Also represented by ELIZABETH
C. CARVER , EMMA CATHRENE HARTY , N ICK E. WILLIAMSON;
ROBERT G ERARD L ANCASTER, Santa Monica, CA.
______________________
-- 1 of 2 --
DATATREASURY CORPORATION v. FISERV, INC. 2
Before M OORE, WALLACH , and CHEN, Circuit Judges.
P ER CURIAM .
We deny the appeal as moot in light of our order in
DataTreasury Corp. v. Fidelity National Information, No.
16-1046.
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.